- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:42:33 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2847 Summary: RQ-148 Clarify the use of the word "truncation" in lexical forms. (Truncation-not-defined) Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: resolved Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org This issue was originally reported by Steven Taschuk. Part 2: Datatypes frequently defines the lexical representation of one type as a "truncation" of that of another, without ever defining what is meant by this term. Sometimes it seems to have the conventional meaning of omitting characters from one end of a string, as in: The lexical representation for gYear is the reduced (right truncated) lexical representation for dateTime: CCYY. [section 3.2.11.1] Other times the omitted characters are replaced by other characters, as in: The lexical representation for gDay is the left truncated lexical representation for date: ---DD . [section 3.2.13.1] It's not difficult to understand what is meant, but the document overall aspires to (and for the most part handily achieves) a higher standard of precision. For consistency, I'd like to see the term defined in 1.1. See mail from: Steven Taschuk. (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0128.html ) This is R-190. On the 11/21/2008 telcon we agreed to add to the 1.1 Requirements and classify as "Clarification without Erratum" This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-05-12 (http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html). ... The term 'truncation' is no longer used in discussing these lexical spaces; it is hoped that this addresses the concern adequately.
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 01:42:40 UTC