- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:58:23 -0700
- To: "'Lucian Holland'" <lefh@decisionsoft.co.uk>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lucian Holland [mailto:lefh@decisionsoft.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:19 PM > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: xhtml:emph in hasFactAndProperty schema > > Obviously not a big deal, but I was a little surprised to > find that the hasFacetAndProperty schema available at > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-hasFactAndProperty doesn't validate > against the schema for schemas when an XHTML schema is > available because it uses the non-existent "xhtml:emph" element > in place of (I assume) "xhtml:em" in some of the documentation. > Although the XHTML schemas are only a w3c note, the element doesn't > appear in the official DTDs either... Is this a mistake or am I > missing something here? No, you are not missing anything...those occurances should be xhtml:em. I've copied the schema comments list so that it gets in the offical pipeline. pvb
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 18:11:37 UTC