2E PER question about review scope from Jeremy Carroll on 2004-03-22 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from January to March 2004)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:58:56 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <405F2960.3030005@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

A simple question:
what is the appropriate scope of review and comments on the PER
I am particularly interested in datatypes, and was thinking of reviewing 
using the errata and the new version to make comments about the changes 
beteween the new PER and the REC of 2001.

Is that appropriate?

Jeremy Carroll

Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 12:59:34 UTC