W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2004

2E PER: scope of comments/review on PER?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:30:40 +0000
Message-ID: <405F22C0.6060108@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org



A simple question:
what is the appropriate scope of review and comments on the PER
I am particularly interested in datatypes, and was thinking of reviewing 
using the errata and the new version to make comments about the changes 
beteween the new PER and the REC of 2001.

Is that appropriate?

Jeremy Carroll

Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 12:31:01 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeremy Carroll: "2E PER question about review scope"
Previous message: Anli Shundi: "two more typos in Part 2 of PER"
Next in thread: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 2E PER: scope of comments/review on PER?"
Reply: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: 2E PER: scope of comments/review on PER?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:02 UTC