A simple question: what is the appropriate scope of review and comments on the PER I am particularly interested in datatypes, and was thinking of reviewing using the errata and the new version to make comments about the changes beteween the new PER and the REC of 2001. Is that appropriate? Jeremy CarrollReceived on Monday, 22 March 2004 12:31:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:02 UTC