Re: CR-20 wildcard-minus: Make wildcard namespace selection more powerful?

I wish to record a mild dissent.  My concern is not so much that this
particular bit of functionality is missing in 1.0 but rather that you
have locked yourself in to a syntactic approach that will make it hard
to add it cleanly in the future. Your current design invents an ad hoc
non-XML syntax to enable an attribute value to describe a set of
namespaces.  In general, I would suggest it's a bad approach to try and
pack structured information into an attribute value: it often works at
first, but as you try to add more features, it runs out of steam and an
incresingly baroque and non-orthogonal syntax becomes necessary. I think
you would be much better off to use elements in the content of the "any"
element to describe the set of namespaces.

Ashok Malhotra wrote:
> Dear James:
> The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several weeks
> working through the comments received from the public on the
> Candidate Recommendation (CR) of the XML Schema specification. We
> thank you for the comments you made on our specification during
> our CR comment period, and want to make sure you know that all
> comments received during the CR comment period have been recorded
> in our CR issues list (
> ).
> The WG carefully considered your suggestion and there was
> sentiment for adopting it but it was felt that it required too
> much work for Version 1 and should be postponed until Version 1.1.
> It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the
> decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the
> WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director of
> the W3C.
> All the best, Ashok

Received on Friday, 26 January 2001 05:07:25 UTC