Re: Michael Dyck's comments on Use Cases

Jonathan Robie wrote:
> This is a response to the following messages, which you posted to the XML
> Query Working Group's comments list:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0016.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0019.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0020.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0026.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0027.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0028.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0029.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0030.html

There's also these, which I believe have not had a response yet:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0013.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0048.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0049.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0023.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0030.html

Maybe the latter 4 were submitted too late for this publication cycle
(although really, an April 29th submission is too late for a June 8th
publication?), but the first two certainly weren't.

-Michael Dyck

Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 02:25:49 UTC