- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:51:35 -0400
- To: "Michael Dyck" <MichaelDyck@home.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your enumeration of your comments that you think are outstanding. Here is a summary of their status within the XML Query WG: >There's also these, which I believe have not had a response yet: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0000 .html My records indicate that we have not yet processed this comment. This is my fault (as Chair) since I appear to have missed allocating this comment for review. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0013 .html The WG response to this comment can be found in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0051. html >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0048 .html The WG is still reviewing this comment. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0049 .html The WG has approved a response to this comment and our representative is delinquent in sending our official response. Look for this response by the end of this week. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0023 .html The WG is still reviewing this comment. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0030 .htm The WG is still reviewing this comment. I apologize for the delay in responding to your comments on the XML Query specifications. I will be elevating the importance of this work within the WG and will attempt to obtain more timely responses for you and others that comment on the XML Query specifications. We appreciate your feedback on the XML Query specifications. Please let us know if this response is satisfactory. If not, please respond to this message, explaining your concerns. Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dyck [mailto:MichaelDyck@home.com] > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:22 AM > To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: Michael Dyck's comments on Use Cases > > > Jonathan Robie wrote: > > This is a response to the following messages, which you > posted to the XML > > Query Working Group's comments list: > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/200 1Mar/0016.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0019. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0020. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0026. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0027. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0028. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0029. html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0030. html There's also these, which I believe have not had a response yet: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0000. html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Mar/0013. html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0048. html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Apr/0049. html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0023. html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001May/0030. html Maybe the latter 4 were submitted too late for this publication cycle (although really, an April 29th submission is too late for a June 8th publication?), but the first two certainly weren't. -Michael Dyck
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 12:10:46 UTC