- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:20:31 -0400
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 14:20:40 UTC
/ Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh wrote: | |> That mail seems pretty clear to me. Unless I misunderstand, the |> combination of show/actuate that you've proposed in that message |> isn't allowed by SVG. So the SVG semantics don't apply. | | Which means what for an implementor? It's great that everyone | involved disclaims responsibility for what the correct implementation | is, but it doesn't help implementors one bit. I'm not sure how the spec can be said to disclaim responsibility for markup that isn't allowed by the spec. | In any case, we're basically no longer using the generic XLink | implementation in Gecko for svg:a, because we discovered that in | practice the two are pretty incompatible. Which means we'll probably | look into removing the generic XLink processor, since it's useless in | practice when other languages reuse XLink. I wish I'd been able to better understand in what way you think they're incompatible given that SVG uses XLink. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 14:20:40 UTC