- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:53 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- CC: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > I wish I'd been able to better understand in what way you think > they're incompatible given that SVG uses XLink. It "uses" it in the sense that it reuses some attributes (but not really others), and defines its own semantics for them, effectively. Thus a generic XLink processor, doing generic semantics as defined by XLink itself, cannot implement SVG. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 05:16:04 UTC