Re: comments on XPointer

  Hi Michael,

 The XML Linking Working Group reviewed your comments [1] on the 
XPointer second Last Call working draft [2]. They were added to
the Issue List as Issues XP105 and XP106 [3].
 The Disposition of Comment for XPointer Second Last Call list [4]
them:
   - Issue (editorial-cmsmcq) in 2.1 the editorial comments were
     accepted and will be changed in the specification
   - The constraints related to allowing arbitrary schemes for
     text/xml and aplication/xml do not us to provide this as explained
     by Eve:
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0085.html
     we assume that your answer was an agreement of the WG position
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0087.html

  thanks for your feedback,

Daniel

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/att-0053/01-xptrrev.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/
[3] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html#XP105
[4] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-LC2-comments.html


-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/