- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:39:45 +0200
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@uic.edu>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Hi Michael,
The XML Linking Working Group reviewed your comments [1] on the
XPointer second Last Call working draft [2]. They were added to
the Issue List as Issues XP105 and XP106 [3].
The Disposition of Comment for XPointer Second Last Call list [4]
them:
- Issue (editorial-cmsmcq) in 2.1 the editorial comments were
accepted and will be changed in the specification
- The constraints related to allowing arbitrary schemes for
text/xml and aplication/xml do not us to provide this as explained
by Eve:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0085.html
we assume that your answer was an agreement of the WG position
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0087.html
thanks for your feedback,
Daniel
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/att-0053/01-xptrrev.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/
[3] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html#XP105
[4] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-LC2-comments.html
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 12:40:12 UTC