Hi Michael, The XML Linking Working Group reviewed your comments [1] on the XPointer second Last Call working draft [2]. They were added to the Issue List as Issues XP105 and XP106 [3]. The Disposition of Comment for XPointer Second Last Call list [4] them: - Issue (editorial-cmsmcq) in 2.1 the editorial comments were accepted and will be changed in the specification - The constraints related to allowing arbitrary schemes for text/xml and aplication/xml do not us to provide this as explained by Eve: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0085.html we assume that your answer was an agreement of the WG position http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0087.html thanks for your feedback, Daniel [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/att-0053/01-xptrrev.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xptr-20010108/ [3] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html#XP105 [4] http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xptr-LC2-comments.html -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 12:40:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:12 UTC