Re: Xpointer Questions

  Hi Mark,

 The XML Linking Working Group reviewed your comments [1] on the 
XPointer second Last Call working draft [2]. They were added to
the Issue List as Issue XP109 [3].
 The Disposition of Comment for XPointer Second Last Call list [4]
them (Issue (editorial-pollman) in 2.1 and Issue (axis-pollman) in
    - the first part of your comment resulted in the decision to
      rewrite the section 5.3.4 to clarify the pointb raised, the
      new wording is available from the Issue List [3].
    - in the second question, yes this part was lacking some
      precision, we will rewrite this part too and provide a
      graphic to explain "visually" the relationship beween sibling
    - considering the third part, the the "following" and "preceding"
      axes were missing as you pointed out, they will be defined as
      empty in the final version
    - the last part of your comment was considered editorial and

  thanks for your feedback, we would appreciate if you could express
if the resolution of those issues fits your expectations.



Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 12:52:20 UTC