- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:51:50 -0400
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
At 11:50 AM 7/11/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > >> I'd strongly prefer that XLink >> require URI references, should it use them at all as identifiers, to be >> absolutized by the authors - i.e., forbid relative URI references and >> require literal comparison of strings. > >I agree, I agree, but please send it to www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, >so that your views get on file. (Actually, don't bother; I've >forwarded *this* message there. Eric van der Vlist had already raised these questions on xml-linking-comments, to no response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0013 .html I'm not sure that getting these views on file as _mine_ is necessary, though it's probably wise to discuss solutions to XLink's problems on an XLink list. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2000 10:49:29 UTC