- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:50:00 -0400
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- CC: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>, "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>, xml-uri@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > I'd strongly prefer that XLink > require URI references, should it use them at all as identifiers, to be > absolutized by the authors - i.e., forbid relative URI references and > require literal comparison of strings. I agree, I agree, but please send it to www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, so that your views get on file. (Actually, don't bother; I've forwarded *this* message there. > Otherwise we'll have all the same comparison issues we've debated here ad > nauseam inflicted on XLink. If the RDF community enjoys that burden, > they're welcome to it, but I'd rather not drop comparison issues on yet > another audience. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2000 11:51:56 UTC