- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Yasir Khan <yasir.khan@ascertia.com>
- Cc: "www-xkms@w3.org" <www-xkms@w3.org>
> Can we also use the same convention for names of XKMS elements that are > defined to be QNAME in XKMS specification ..? I am using example of > <KeyUsage> element to explain my question: Case 1 requires the default namespace to be the XKMS namespace. Case 2 requires both the default and a prefix xkms to be the XKMS namespace. As long as the right conditions are met, both cases are valid. For the sake of editorial clarity, I would like to see the spec changed so that the XKMS namespace is properly declared, and that we use case-2 as the style: > <KeyUsage>xkms:Signature</KeyUsage> -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 14:24:59 UTC