- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:54:03 +0000
- To: Rigo@w3.org
- Cc: jose.kahan@w3.org, "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
Hi Rigo, In [1], you asked about including xaedes in the xkms spec. Its only today (chatting with Jose) that I finally figured out that you wanted us to add XAdES as a row in the usekeywith list in 5.1.3 of part 1 [2]. Well, I don't think that that'd be a good thing to do, since the other entries in the "application" column are all applications (*) and are not data formats. So, for example, we do include "S/MIME" but do not include "CMS". Inlcuding CMS or XMLSIG would be the equivalent to including XAdES. Hope this clarifies things, and sorry for being so obtuse about what you were requesting, Regards, Stephen. (*) Ok, so PKIX isn't really, but the well-defined but highly complex PKIX ldap & path processing rules are such that it makes sense to flag this in a locate/validate as a hint for the server. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2003Oct/0008.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20030826/xkms-part-1.html#XKMS_2_0_Section_5_1_3
Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 09:01:29 UTC