Re: DAML-S and UDDI from Jeff Lansing on 2003-08-01 (www-ws@w3.org from August 2003)

From: Jeff Lansing <jeff@polexis.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 13:55:06 -0700
To: paolucci+@cs.cmu.edu
CC: www-ws@w3c.org
Message-ID: <3F2AD3AA.4070907@polexis.com>

Massimo Paolucci wrote:

>The
>mapping makes use of UDDI API for the features that are common to both
>description languages, and uses TModels to represent features of
>DAML-S that are not represented in the UDDI API.  
>  
>
Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. Once the versioning problems are 
worked out, then this could become the "standard" way to represent the 
information about what a service does (and DAML-S gives a model for that 
information) in UDDI. Very much like the UDDI "best practices" document 
for representing WSDL.

Jeff

PS: please keep me informed on updates to the mapping.

Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 16:55:18 UTC