- From: Massimo Paolucci <paolucci@icarus.cimds.ri.cmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:15:25 -0400
- To: Jeff Lansing <jeff@polexis.com>
- Cc: www-ws@w3c.org
Jeff, the paper that Terry referred to is a bit out of date since it refers to a mapping from DAML-S 0.6 to UDDI v2, so it needs to be updated. Nevertheless, I believe that the basic idea is still valid. The mapping makes use of UDDI API for the features that are common to both description languages, and uses TModels to represent features of DAML-S that are not represented in the UDDI API. Anyway, any comment is welcome. --- Massimo
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 14:15:42 UTC