- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:31:16 -0800
- To: "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Changed PUT to DELETE. Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:26 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: 'www-ws-desc' > Subject: Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions > > I agree on GET. > Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me. > I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type. > What do you think? > Youenn > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit > assertions > > about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix - > it > > doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing > > tests.) > > > > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM > >> To: Jonathan Marsh > >> Cc: www-ws-desc > >> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions > >> > >> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE. > >> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type > >> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded". > >> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions. > >> What do you think? > >> Regards, > >> Youenn Fablet > >> > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 21:31:09 UTC