- From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:26:01 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I agree on GET.
Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me.
I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type.
What do you think?
Youenn
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit assertions
> about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix - it
> doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing
> tests.)
>
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: www-ws-desc
>> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions
>>
>> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE.
>> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type
>> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
>> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions.
>> What do you think?
>> Regards,
>> Youenn Fablet
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 14:26:26 UTC