- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:36:12 -0800
- To: "'keith chapman'" <keithgchapman@gmail.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01bf01c756c9$7d68bda0$1501010a@DELLICIOUS>
Yes, per the resolution of CR148 [1], which was influenced by the chorus [2] stating that was a bad thing. Bummer for dispatching though. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR148 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0051.html Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: keith chapman [mailto:keithgchapman@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:33 AM To: Jonathan Marsh Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Re: SOAP Response and SOAP Action Do you mean that there cannot be soapAction with the soapResponse MEP? Thanks, Keith. On 2/21/07, Jonathan Marsh < jonathan@wso2.com <mailto:jonathan@wso2.com> > wrote: ? 2007-02-15: Jonathan to check whether the test suite needs to be fixed with regards to SOAP Response and action I did this. There is now a message level assertion that checks that even when a soapAction is specified with the soap-response MEP, that it doesn't end up in the message. A new red square resulted in both Canon and WSO2 implementations as a result - message 1 in MessageTest-4G. Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com -- Keith Chapman WSO2 Inc. Oxygen for Web Services Developers. http://wso2.org/
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 21:36:13 UTC