- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:50:26 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF380465D2.EF2C5FA6-ON85257230.004BCA8A-85257230.004C074D@ca.ibm.com>
David, So do you think it is useful to also (the extra 1%) specify the canonical form of the fragids to simplify comparison? Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/23/2006 09:21 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> cc "www-ws-desc" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Subject RE: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers It is eerily familiar because it is 99% a cut and paste from wsdl 2.0 :-) Dave From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:43 PM To: Philippe Le Hegaret Cc: www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon Subject: Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1] looks eerily familiar. We added some text on a canomical form. I suggest they do the same. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/16/2006 05:33 AM To www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> Subject agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a Working Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those identifiers would then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as WSDL 1.1 domain expressions. 1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document by the WS Policy WG? 2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and provide feedback to the WS Policy WG? Regards, Philippe [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAttachment
Received on Friday, 24 November 2006 13:50:41 UTC