It is eerily familiar because it is 99% a cut and paste from wsdl 2.0
:-)
Dave
________________________________
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:43 PM
To: Philippe Le Hegaret
Cc: www-ws-desc; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org; Yves Lafon
Subject: Re: agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
[1] looks eerily familiar.
We added some text on a canomical form. I suggest they do the
same.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
11/16/2006 05:33 AM
To
www-ws-desc <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc
Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Subject
agenda+ WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers
The Web Services Policy Working Group is currently working on a
Working
Group Note for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers [1]. Those
identifiers would
then be used in the external policy attachment mechanism [2] as
WSDL 1.1
domain expressions.
1. Would the WSDL WG object to the publication of the document
by the WS
Policy WG?
2. Would the WSDL WG be interested in reviewing the document and
provide
feedback to the WS Policy WG?
Regards,
Philippe
[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifi
ers.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061102/#ExternalPolicyAt
tachment