W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2006

Re: SOAP Response and IRI style

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:54:57 -0500
To: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB62589C9.24B19E38-ON8525722E.0057192F-8525722E.00576D6E@ca.ibm.com>


#none seems easy to bind, i.e. no input parameters. I guess you could also 
achieve this using an empty element.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca

Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
11/22/2006 10:41 AM


SOAP Response and IRI style

When the soap response MEP is used to bound an in-out operation, the 
input being defined by a schema,
the input is serialized in the URI following the url-encoded 
serialization (section 6.7.2).
This serialization requires the use of the IRI style which puts a 
constraint on the kind of operations that can be bound to the soap 
response mep.
It seems sensible to me that inout operations can be bound to the 
soap-response mep if:
    - the input message is a #none kind of message (I did not found any 
text about this case by the way, I may have missed something)
    - the input message is a #element kind of message with the element 
schema following the IRI style constraints
Does this make sense?
Should we add some text in the specification to clarify this?
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2006 15:55:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:07:03 UTC