- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:16:38 +0200
- To: "John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, John Kaputin <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
John, yes, that still needs clarification.
My take would be like this:
1) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} need not be copied
from Binding {http transfer coding default}, the defaulting rules for
{http transfer coding} should reach there themselves; however if both
defaults are present, the operation default applies to components within
this operation.
2) BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} should not apply to
BindingFaultReference components (as per my previous email), and neither
should it apply to BindingFault components (because they are not in
scope).
3) Binding {http transfer coding default} does not apply to Interface*
components, it should apply to BindingFault and BindingMessageReference
components.
If any of that disagrees with the current spec, I think the spec should
be fixed. 8-)
>From this, below I give concrete comments to your statements.
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 01:22 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> It's clear that BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding}
> defaults to BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated.
BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} should default to
BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} or, if that is not
present, to Binding {http transfer coding default}.
> But does BindingFault {http transfer coding} also default to
> BindingOperation {http transfer coding default} as stated in this
> section and if so, to which operation? I am wondering if BindingFault
> should default to Binding {http transfer coding default} instead.
BindingFault {http transfer coding} only defaults to Binding {http
transfer coding default}.
> Is there any intended relationship between Binding {http transfer
> coding default} and BindingOperation {http transfer coding default}?
I'd say no such relationship is necessary, apart from that hidden in how
BindingMessageReference {http transfer coding} property is defaulted.
Hope it's not too controversial (or confusing),
Jacek
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 09:16:50 UTC