See also: IRC log
June 15th minutes approved
AIs for interop skipped
Paul's AI: In progress
Jonathan's AI: Per Jacek, in progress
Glen's AI: Not present at telecon
Charlton's AI: Marked completed based on this morning's update
Gil's AI: In progress
Jonathan's AI: Not present at telcon
Arthur's AIs: Not present at telcon
Looks like we'll have a telcon next week.
SPARQL wsdl bug - In progress
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html
Postpone issue since we don't have Arthur or Jonathan today
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR037
Postpone issue since we don't have Arthur
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0057.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0073.html
Charlton: I suggested some language on the last call to make Section 6.3.1 read more smoothly.
Tony: Since we declined CR044, we will include this resolution as a suggestion for language to clarify the rationale for default properties in support of interface-less bindings
Jacek: We need to correct the language suggested for section 6.8 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0026.html
ACTION: Charlton to update his proposal for CR044 based on the language correction suggested by Jacek per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0026.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/29-ws-desc-minutes.html#action04]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
Unfortunately Paul just dropped off the telcon, so we'll postpone discussion of this issue
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052
Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
(non-sequitur to CR044 - no objections to accepting the proposal; will forward it to the editors as described)
CR052 wants to speak toward updating the state through an append
Roberto: Not a trivial change
Jacek: Not serializing the location as part of the payload
Philippe: This is a new use case. A bit late in the cycle to include it
Tony: Input for the next revision
Jacek: Or toward producing a new extension
Tony: e.g. HTTP 2.0 binding. Difficult to handle a new use case at this time, agreed. We'll need to respond likewise.
Jacek volunteers to address this.
ACTION: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 explaining that this represents a new use case, and that we will not be able to address this as such in the spec, but that it can be addressed as an additional extension... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/29-ws-desc-minutes.html#action01]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053
Allow absolute URI in {location}
Jacek: I don't think it is possible to craft
the URI inclusive of extended variables
... I think what he wants is that the location be considered for combination
with the base IRI
Philippe: Don't see anything that makes that impossible
<JacekK> location="http://foo"; address="http://example.com/"; whttp:location="{location}"
<JacekK> http://example.com/{location}
<JacekK> http://example.com/http://foo
<Roberto> 6.4.2. says:
<Roberto> Input serializations may define additional processing rules to be applied to the value of {http location} before combining it with the {address} property of the endpoint element to form the HTTP request IRI.
<gil> it seems like there are two issues here
Jacek: Need to clarify and provide an example - to illustrate where the address will be ignored and not included in the path - it isn't obvious
<Roberto> 6.4.2: This IRI is combined with the base IRI specified in the {address} property of the Endpoint component to form the full IRI for the HTTP request to invoke the operation.
Roberto: Also need to clarify what is meant as the combination of IRIs
<gil> (a) seems to be another new use case around "following a hyperlink"
<Roberto> where are the combination rules?
<gil> (b) seems to be clarifying the spec
Jacek: I think the spec supports this as Roberto described. Only need to clarify that it is in fact true, and that it may have an unexpected effect in certain corner cases
Philippe: Are we doing some URI escaping or not?
Tony: Only response is that there is no escape. What Roberto appears to have pointed out is that it substitutes the location before deciding what to do with what amounts to the two URIs
Jacek: No escaping mentioned in 6.7
Tony: If provide substitution by itself, implying "use URI as URI, don't escape it", but if in a string, then it is a parameter
Jacek: If anything before the parameter, escape it, otherwise not
Roberto: Way to address this would be to add more syntax
Philippe: Add explanatory text to spec - no encoding at this stage, and encoding only once full URI is formed. We would need to add a warning re: security w.r.t. this. Someone can make your service to go somewhere else if you don't check what you use as input.
Tony: So we should clearly indicate that no escaping is going on?
Jacek: Someone can interpret our spec to indicate that escaping is going on
Philippe: We need to clarify the spec language around this
ACTION: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify the issue in CR53 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/29-ws-desc-minutes.html#action02]
Tony: Sounds like Eric is asking for a change to XForms
Jacek: I think we should correct Eric on this. Specifies element name, not attribute, in section 6.1.1
Philippe: Don't believe there is an issue here. Eric is providing feedback as requested.
ACTION: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his interpretation of the text as described in CR054 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/29-ws-desc-minutes.html#action03]
Jacek: This is done
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html
<JacekK> Jacek's action completed at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0026.html
Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding
<JacekK> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0032.html
I believe the desired description is clearly made with the language at hand with the proposal for CR044
Tony: If we accept Charlton's language for CR044 than we can consider this issue closed as well
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0073.html
Tony: CR055 to be left open pending Charlton's AI for CR044
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR056
Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties
Tony: Mark CR056 as pending based on administrivia 4c
[Philippe fixed the reported typo]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR057
HTTPHeader name should be xs:string
, not
xs:QName
Jacek: Does anyone disdisagree with John Kaputin on this?
Gil: Note that John has implemented HTTPHeader as xs:string in Woden
Jacek: Have an example...
Jacek reads proposal
Resolution: Accept John's proposal as editorial item
ACTION: Editors to ensure that HTTPHeader name is of type xs:string, and not XS:Qname (see issue CR057)
Tony: At the end of time for the telcon - see you on the call next week