- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:05:21 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jul/0004.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici, Gilbert Pilz, Paul Downey,
Philippe Le Hegaret, Tom Jordahl, Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels,
Amelia Lewis, Youenn Fablet, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Allen Brookes,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- July 6 [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/att-0016/2006070
6-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
[Interop]
DONE 2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to add sorting of soap modules,
http/soap headers.
DUP 2006-06-01: [interop] John to file issue whether {rpc
signature} should be OPTIONAL (4.1.1).
? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for
an unknown extension wsdl:required=true.
? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for
an unknown extension wsdl:required=false.
? 2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to write test cases for messages
and message exchanges for a simple WSDL (eg: an
echo web service).
DUP 2006-06-15: [interop] Jonathan to build a new XSLT to
construct the validation reports.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Lawrence - violate operation style
assertions.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Youenn - define documents for stub
generation.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Jonathan - create validation-report
stylesheet.
DUP 2006-07-06: [interop] John - resolve Woden component model
interchange.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Arthur - add xpaths for soap and http
to document.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Philippe - violate http binding
assertions.
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Chathura - will do interop tests with
Youenn and Lawrence.
? 2006-07-07: [interop] Arthur to commit patches from yesterday
DONE 2006-07-07: [interop] Jonathan to fix Ant tasks for cm
interchange model format
DONE 2006-07-07: [interop] Jonathan to run WSDL XSLT over new
test suite
? 2006-07-07: [interop] John to contribute some test cases
? 2006-07-07: [interop] John to resolve Woden problems in cm
interchange format
? 2006-07-07: [interop] John to write spec text for transfer
coding
? 2006-07-07: [interop] to contribute test cases for assertions
? 2006-07-07: [interop] Arthur to add TestMetadata.xml
validation
to Ant scripts
? 2006-07-07: [interop] Lawrence to create message test cases
based
on interop log files
? 2006-07-07: [interop] Philippe to add stats on the assertion
coverage page
? 2006-07-07: [interop] Arthur to include counts of good/bad
documents in document coverage report
WG
? 2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF
publication.
? 2006-06-08: Gil to write a response to the raiser of CR47.
DONE [.6] 2006-06-15: Jonathan to file the issue rpc signature issue.
? 2006-06-15: Arthur to update CR022 proposal.
? 2006-06-15: Arthur to propose part 1 text about REQUIRED
extensions.
DONE [.4] 2006-06-29: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052
explaining that this represents a new use case,
and that we will not be able to address this as
such in the spec, but that it can be addressed as
an additional extension...
? 2006-06-29: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify
the issue in CR53.
DONE [.5] 2006-06-29: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his
interpretation of the text as described in CR054.
? 2006-07-06: Glen to contribute some extension test cases.
DONE [.3] 2006-07-06: Roberto to propose text for CR044 and related
interface-less binding text.
? 2006-07-06: Arthur to update cm interchange schema to make
http cookies optional in the soap extension.
? 2006-07-06: John to write proposal for CR055 based on
discussion and Jacek's email.
Current Editorial Action Items
- none -
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0046.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0034.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0035.html
[.6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Jul/0002
.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Next telcon 27 July, August off, resuming Sept. 7
b. SPARQL wsdl bug [.1]
c. WSDL 1.1 schemas [.2]
d. Multiple ports [.3]
e. targetNamespace optional? [.4]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0059.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0069.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jul/0004.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Interop event report [.1]
- Timeline to complete CR testing - late Sept?
- Timeline to resolve existing CR issues - substantial by next week,
editorial in Sept.
- Moving interop-related issues higher on the agenda
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0044.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each
other [.1]
- Reopen this issue to change the syntax? [.2]
- Components of the latest proposal:
+ Roberto [.3]
+ Jacek [.4]
+ amendment? "applies to" terminology [.5, .6]
+ amendment? don't mention interface [.7]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0046.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0014.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0047.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0054.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0055.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue CR070: Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR070
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue CR071: Request 2 clarifications for RPC style [.1]
- Roberto's pushback [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR071
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0017.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue CR072: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension
properties [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR072
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR074: Assetions covered by schema validation [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR074
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR073: Suggested editorial changes to adjuncts section
4.1.1 wrpc:signature [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR073
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR075: Suggested editorial changes for IRI and Multipart
styles [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR075
-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR076: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not
specified? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR076
-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1]
- Arthur's proposal [.2]
- ACTION: John to write proposal for CR055 based on discussion and
Jacek's email
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058
-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http
authentication scheme} match? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060
-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1]
- Terminology clarification [.2]
- WS-Addressing example [.3]
- Arthur's proposed clarification [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1]
- ACTION: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify the
issue in CR53
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053
-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR069: Deconstructing MEPs [.1]
- Amy's pushback [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR069
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0036.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
[.1]
- ACTION: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 explaining that
this represents a new use case, and that we will not be able
to address this as such in the spec, but that it can be
addressed as an additional extension... [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0034.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1]
- ACTION: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his
interpretation of the text as described in CR054 [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0035.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
22. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1]
- Status quo [.2]
- ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema
without namespace [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
23. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited}
appear? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059
-----------------------------------------------------------------
24. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061
-----------------------------------------------------------------
25. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062
-----------------------------------------------------------------
26. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063
-----------------------------------------------------------------
27. Issue CR066: Endpoint component {name} property vs xml
representation
as a QName [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR066
-----------------------------------------------------------------
28. Issue CR068: WSDL 2.0 part 2 comment - 2.3.x, 2.2.x wording problems
[.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR068
-----------------------------------------------------------------
29. Issue CR064: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR064
-----------------------------------------------------------------
30. Issue CR065: Re: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR065
-----------------------------------------------------------------
31. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021
-----------------------------------------------------------------
32. Features "at risk"
- Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2]
+ collecting data on f&p deployment
- HTTP Binding
+ awaiting data from implementers
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 19:06:32 UTC