Agenda: 6 July 2006 WS Description telcon

0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]: 

See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon. 

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Jul/0000.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda 

1.  Welcome new member: Eran Chinthaka
    Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is one of: 
      David Orchard, Bijan Parsia, Umit Yalcinalp, Asir Vedamuthu, 
      Roberto Chinnici, Gilbert Pilz, Paul Downey, Tom Jordahl, 
      Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Approval of minutes: (Youenn was also present.)
  - June 29 [.1]

[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/att-0001/2006062
9-ws-desc-minutes.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Review of Action items [.1]. 

Interop
?         2006-06-01: [interop] Jonathan to add sorting of soap modules,
                      http/soap headers.
?         2006-06-01: [interop] John to file issue whether {rpc
                      signature} should be OPTIONAL (4.1.1).
?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for 
                      an unknown extension wsdl:required=true.
?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to create a testcase for 
                      an unknown extension wsdl:required=false.
?         2006-06-08: [interop] Arthur to write test cases for messages 
                      and message exchanges for a simple WSDL (eg: an 
                      echo web service).
?         2006-06-15: [interop] Jonathan to build a new XSLT to 
                      construct the validation reports. 

WG
?         2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group 
                      report for requirements for schema evolution 
                      following closure of LC124 
?         2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF
                      publication. 
?         2006-04-20: Glen to flesh out a model for runtime test
                      scenarios.
?         2006-06-08: Gil to write a response to the raiser of CR47.
?         2006-06-15: Jonathan to file the issue rpc signature issue. 
?         2006-06-15: Arthur to update CR022 proposal. 
?         2006-06-15: Arthur to propose part 1 test about REQUIRED 
                      extensions.
DONE [.3] 2006-06-29: Charlton to update his proposal for CR044 based on

                      the language correction suggested by Jacek per 
 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0026.html.
?         2006-06-29: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 
                      explaining that this represents a new use case, 
                      and that we will not be able to address this as 
                      such in the spec, but that it can be addressed as 
                      an additional extension...
?         2006-06-29: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify 
                      the issue in CR53.
?         2006-06-29: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his
                      interpretation of the text as described in CR054.

Current Editorial Action Items
 - none -

Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2]. 

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0075.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  Administrivia
  a. Next telcon 13 July
  b. Interop event
  c. Issue CR050? Policy on REQUIRED properties of OPTIONAL extensions
  d. SPARQL wsdl bug [.2]
  e. F&P process, upcoming WS-Policy FTF
  f. WSDL 1.1 schemas [.3]
  g. Multiple ports [.4]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/6/07/interop-logistic.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0059.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0069.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
5.  Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1]
  - Terminology clarification [.2]
  - WS-Addressing example [.3]
  - Arthur's proposed clarification [.4]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Issue CR037: Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 [.1]
  - Arthur looking into why one might need these media types.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR037

-----------------------------------------------------------------
7.  Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each 
                 other [.1]
  - Reopen this issue ? [.2]
  - Charlton's latest proposal [.3]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0075.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
8.  Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1]
  - Status quo [.2]
  - ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema 
            without namespace [.3]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
9.  Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
[.1]
  - ACTION: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 explaining that 
            this represents a new use case, and that we will not be able

            to address this as such in the spec, but that it can be 
            addressed as an additional extension...

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052

-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1]
  - ACTION: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify the 
            issue in CR53

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053

-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1]
  - ACTION: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his
            interpretation of the text as described in CR054

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054

-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1]
  - Arthur's proposal [.2]
  - ACTION: Jacek to write a clarification to Arthur's proposal, 
    explaining that BindingFault is correct, not BindingFaultReference
  - left open pending Charlton's clarification text.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR056: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension
    properties [.1]
  - Philippe fixed the typo.
  - Open pending reopening of CR050.

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR056

-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR058: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR058

-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited}
                 appear? [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059

-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR060: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http 
                 authentication scheme} match? [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR060

-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in 
                 example - should be NCNames [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061

-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in 
                 example - should be NCNames [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062

-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1]

[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063

-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Features "at risk"
  - Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2]
    + collecting data on f&p deployment
  - HTTP Binding
    + awaiting data from implementers

[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html

Received on Monday, 3 July 2006 20:52:23 UTC