RE: SOAP binding representation in the component model

+1.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:55 AM
> To: Lawrence Mandel
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOAP binding representation in the component model
> 
> 
> Lawrence, I expect that the word "property" is used to mean "a
property
> of a component", like Description component has properties {interface}
> and {bindings} etc. The component model can be extended like this by
> WSDL extensions.
> 
> In other words, I don't think it has anything to do with Properties
(as
> in Features&Properties).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jacek
> 
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:18 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> >
> > The WSDL 2.0 adjunts document specifies the rules for specifying a
> > SOAP binding. I'm clear with how SOAP bindings are represented in
the
> > XML model. I'm unclear about how SOAP bindings are represented in
the
> > component model. Taking section 5.4 about SOAP version as an
example,
> > I can specify the SOAP version on the XML model by specifying the
> > attribute
> >
> > wsoap:version="xs:string"
> >
> > on the binding element. According to section 5.4.2,
> >
> > The SOAP protocol specification adds the following property to the
> > WSDL component model (as defined in [WSDL 2.0 Core Language]):
> > {soap version} REQUIRED. A xs:string, to the Bindingcomponent.
> >
> > Does this mean that the SOAP version is specified in the component
> > model using a Property (note that property is lower case in the
above
> > description)? If this is the case, is the ref the SOAP namespace,
the
> > URL of the adjuncts document, or something else? Am I completely
> > barking up the wrong tree here?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Lawrence Mandel
> > Software Developer
> > IBM Rational Software
> > Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
> > lmandel@ca.ibm.com
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 17:20:20 UTC