- From: Liu, Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:30:52 -0700
- To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3470F33FF8ED12498D07F3A9651AA18E5B4FF4@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
Item 1 and 3 have been taken care of: I have fixed all the typos mentioned below, and added a reference to ws-a. Please check out the changes at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht ml Item 2 needs to be recorded as a LC issue, and we need a concrete proposal for appropriate changes. Best Regards, Kevin ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rogers, Tony Sent: Wednesday, Sep 21, 2005 5:05 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Comments from WS-A on WSDL 2.0 documents These are the comments I have on the WSDL 2.0 Primer, per the request that the WS-Addressing WG review the WSDL 2.0 documents 1. Typos: a. section 2.3 third para, first line: "either imported nor inlined" should be "either imported or inlined". b. section 2.4.4.1 last para under third bullet "provides examples for the URI style and Multipart style" should be "provides examples for the IRI style and Multipart style" c. section 5.1 second para: "The context that a Web service may be deployed" should probably be: "The context in which a Web service may be deployed". 2. Section 5.3 contains repeated use of the term "endpoint reference" in a sense which is not a WS-A EPR. It would be wise, particularly given the references in 5.2 to WS-A, to make it very clear that the endpoint reference described in 5.3 is not an End Point Reference. Or maybe a different term would be better? Something like "endpoint URL" perhaps? 3. WS Addressing is not included in the References, despite being mentioned in section 5.2. Tony Rogers Computer Associates Senior Architect tel +61 3 9727 8916 fax +61 3 9727 3491 tony.rogers@ca.com <blocked::mailto:tony.rogers@ca.com>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 22:31:06 UTC