- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:44:40 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0003.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Umit Yalcinalp,
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Bijan Parsia, Rebecca Bergersen,
Charlton Baretto, Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Sept 22 telcon [.1].
- Sept 26-27 FTF [.2], and summary [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0039/20050922-ws-desc-minutes.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0067/20050926-ws-desc-minutes.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0067.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2005-06-16: Amy to provide test cases for MEPs not described
in Part 2, due 2005-07.
? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2005-09-22: Marsh will look at section 5.6 in relation to IRI,
due 2005-09-26.
DONE [.4] 2005-09-22: Glen will reword sentence in 5.9.1,
due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to figure out how to treat built-in schema
types. (LC315), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: DaveO to draft a response and send to the WG.
(LC335), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and
see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are
no-ops. (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Roberto to change the order of the union in the
schema in 4.1.2 to match the order in the prose.
(LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to look for simplification options for
comment 12 of 344. (LC344#12), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Jonathan to point his out when it gets implemented
(LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings (LC333), due 2005-10,06
DONE [.3] 2005-09-26: Hugo will write up the resolutions for review
(LC345), due 2005-10-06.
Current Editorial Action Items
? 2005-07-21: Arthur to add stable identifiers for each
assertion, due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-26: editors to fix the first paragraph of section 4
... does not make sense at all right now.
(LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors to add a sentence saying {address} is
optional because it could be defined by other
means, such as an WS-A endpoint reference or maybe
the scenario does not require an address.
(LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors fix "Case Elements NOT cited" in 6.8.1.2
header to be "Case of elements NOT cited" (LC345),
due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to reword references in 5.3 to avoid
confusing WS-addressing endpoint references
(LC346), due 2005-10-06.
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0052.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF Nov 9 (joint) 10-11 Tokyo
- Registration [.1] (now closed - any stragglers?)
- Logistics [.2] (hotel registration closes Oct 9th.)
- Headcount for Wed event? [.3]
b. RDF Mapping publication status [.4]
- Issue tracking? E.g. [.5]
c. Test Case issue tracking [.6, .7]
d. Assertion Table in Part 1 [.8]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0046/wsdl-rdf.html__charset_ISO-8859-2
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0051.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0042.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0056.html
[.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Sep/0017.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [.1]
- Response [.2] to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [.3].
- Tom disagrees [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue LC304: Definition of a IANA media type token [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue LC338: limitations of {http output serialization} [.1]
- Does LC337 resolution take care of this? [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC338
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC337
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded
serialization [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Splitting out the HTTP Binding
- At the FTF there was a groundswell of support for splitting the HTTP
binding out and running it through a third Last Call. I said we'd
consider it at a telcon.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC329: editorial comments on WSDL 2 part 2 - adjuncts -
last call draft? [.1]
- Depends upon LC319 [.2], which is now closed.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC329
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC319
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC342: Typos (Adjuncts) [.1]
- Glen's proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC342
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0052.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
properties? [.1]
- ACTION: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333
-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [.1]
- Proposal (#5):
- remove "it is an error"
- copy the stuff from section 6: if things compose you might
get yourself in trouble
- styles are optional extensions
- ACTION: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue.
- ACTION: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and
see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are
no-ops.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344
-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC347: Interface definition [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC347
-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue LC348: Minor errors in adjunct schema [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC348
-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC349: editorial: part 2 section 2 beginning [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC349
-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC350: Editorial: Part 1, Introduction [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC350
-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue LC351: Editorial: Part 2, XML Namespace Table [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC351
-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue LC352: Bug in RPC Signature Extension Schema [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC352
-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue LC353: What is a valid WSDL component model? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353
-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue LC354: typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119keywords
[.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC354
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 19:44:46 UTC