- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:51:42 +0100
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: paul.downey@bt.com, jmarsh@microsoft.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 10:51:46 UTC
* Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> [2005-11-03 23:28+0100] > Hi, sorry that I only just noticed this, but if we can have multiple > binding operation components with the same name, we need to update the > fragment identifier for these components to be able to address each > particular one of them. This is an issue important for the RDF mapping. That's a good point. > I cannot think at this moment of any distinguishing characteristic of > these same-named binding operations that can readily be used in the > component designators, though. And I thought that different bindings of > one operation can be done in different bindings, and these can then be > provided by the same endpoint, so the SPARQL WSDL can be refactored and > we can (again?) forbid multiple different binding operation components > with the same name. I'm wondering if this means that we are going to require in this case a name property for binding operations to distinguish them. > I think we need email discussion before the f2f so that this can be > readily handled there. Agreed. -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 10:51:46 UTC