- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:05:30 -0700
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "Francis ANDRE" <francis.andre@easynet.fr>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079557B5@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
How would making @name mandatory help distinguish files? There's no requirement the name be unique between files. You already need some out-of-band agreement to define a domain and agree to use unique names within that domain. Doesn't seem much of an additional burden to also agree to use the @name attribute within that domain. ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 7:28 AM To: Francis ANDRE Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org Subject: Re: WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Francis, The name attribute was dropped because it doesn't add much. You can refer to the WSDL document by its URL or its namespace. In WSDL 2.0 you can also refer to any component by a URI (see appendix A and C). The <definitions>/<description> elements are collections, and might describe many Web services. Using the component URI gives you more precision about what you are referring to. Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/ "Francis ANDRE" <francis.andre@easynet.fr> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/16/2005 05:23 AM Please respond to "Francis ANDRE" To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Hi In the current WSDL 1.1 specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl , the attribute "name" of the element <definitions> is optional. When there are more than one webservices specified by many wsdl files supported by a single webserver, it could be useful to have a way to distinguish them. The name attribute seems to be at the right level for this separation. That is why, I am proposing to change the attribute "name" from optional to mandatory. This change request could be also proposed for WSDL 2.0 with the reinstantiation of the "name" attribute which has diseappeared in 2.0 Regards Francis ANDRE
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 00:48:36 UTC