Re: LC review of WS-Addressing

I'm going to work on updating the draft to capture this .. Also my
proposal to bring the "action" concept in to Interface Message Reference
components was to partly address the old ONMR type needs.

Sanjiva.

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 12:31 -0400, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2005 18:21:09 +0200
> Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote:
> > I checked the editors' draft at [1] and it isn't clear that ONMR is not
> > currently a requirement, it certainly does contain a "MUST" in it. I
> > guess this has not been implemented yet or I have the wrong URI for the
> > editors' draft. 8-)
> 
> It simply hasn't been updated yet.  It's one of the existing AIs.
> 
> As TIBCO is one of the signatories to the formal objection, which has
> been satisfied by making the ONMR into a best practice, I've been
> waiting for the update with some anticipation.
> 
> Amy!

Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:51:07 UTC