- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:56:12 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0025.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Jean-Jacques Moreau,
Rebecca Bergersen, Hugo Haas, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky,
Charlton Barreto, Arthur Ryman, Asir Vedamuthu, Amy Lewis
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- April 7 telcon [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/att-0037/2005040
7-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
?* 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith proposal
using an extension namespace. (LC54),
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing the compromise
proposal on formal objections, due 2005-04-11.
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal and email it
to the list as a response to the objection,
due ??.
?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for
the purpose of interoperability testing,
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specfic text for
the editors (LC18), due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-02-17: Jacekk to help Bijan advance the RDF mapping work,
due ??.
?* 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C to
RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still relavant,
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-10: Marsh to troll minutes looking for more CR
criteria, due 2005-04-13.
RETIRED 2005-03-24: DaveO to query MS whether they would support part
of the HTTP binding if divided, due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP binding
into 3 bindings, due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-31: Paul to raise issue for extensibility/versioning
for wsdl using schema 1.0, due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
to produce a component/property table via XSLT,
due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.6] 2005-03-31: Hugo to propose solution for multipart/related
69b, due 2005-04-13.
DONE 2005-03-31: Marsh to look into Roberto's 75g proposal,
due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.8] 2005-03-31: Marsh to see about Berlin logistics,
due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Kevin to fix editorial POST/GET and safety edits,
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-31: Amy to propose text for schemaLocation that Arthur
will evaluate, due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Arthur produces test cases for schemaLocation-less
imports, due 2005-04-07.
DONE [.3] 2005-03-31: Arthur to propose LC80 solution, due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-04-01: PaulD to make a proposal on the packaging of the
schema examples, due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.4] 2005-04-01: Marsh to look at adjustments to the Memorial Day
meeting schedule, due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.5] 2005-04-01: Hugo to push forward discussion of daveo's
proposal option #3 for LC77a, due 2005-04-08.
Outstanding editorial work:
HOLD 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec,
except the frag-id which will move
within media-type reg appendix.
? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like:
The Style property may constrain both
input and output, however a particular
style may constrain in only one
direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1.
? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to call out the difference
between WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 in respect to
single interface per service, and
indicate alternatives
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to rewrite ONMR as Best
practice.
? [.7] 2005-03-10: Editors to check URI and schema references in
Part 1
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0056.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0020.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0050.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0049.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0036.html
[.8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0013.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF dates:
- April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft)
Registration [.1] Logistics [.2]
Draft Agenda
- Start with primer next steps
- WSDL rong-range Schedule
- Issues issues issues
- May 30 - June 1 Berlin
Registration [.3] Logistics [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdf2fberlin5/
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/jun-f2f.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
- LC119 Misc Part 1 editorial issues (DBooth) [.3]
- LC120 Contradictions regarding transitivity of import (DBooth) [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
[.3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Apr/0000
.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0059.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Editorial issue resolutions
- The following editorial issues have been addressed by the
editors by accepting the comment.
+ LC5h
+ LC7
+ LC35
+ LC39
+ LC40
+ LC46
+ LC48a
+ LC48c
+ LC51
+ LC65
+ LC66
+ LC67
+ LC68
+ LC88
+ LC108
+ LC109
- Motion to accept editors recommendations and close the above
issues.
- Motion to refer the following editorial issues to the editors for
resolution.
+ LC93
+ LC95
+ LC97
+ LC112
+ LC119
- Is LC113 correctly classified as 'clarification'? [.1, .2]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0043.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0014.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Media Type Description issues [.1]
- Larry's response to Issue 268 [.2]
- Joe Fialli has three comments [.3]
- I18N re-review [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html
[.4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [.1]
- "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
- Option 1: Status quo (broken?) (DaveO) [.2]
- Option 2: Ignore namespace prefix (DaveO) [.2]
- Option 3: Serialize QName (DaveO) [.2]
- Option 4: Disallow qualified elements (Asir) [.3]
- Option 5: Serialize namespace names (Hugo) [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0032.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0050.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [.1]
- Proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0115.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC74a: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (a) [.1]
- URI vs. IRI
- Proposal [.2]
- xs:anyURI issue? (Asir) [.3]
- Amended proposal (Jonathan) [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74a
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0044.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0054.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0057.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [.1]
- Proposal (Arthur) [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0056.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3:
Bindings (b) [.1]
- XForms supports "multpart/related", WSDL doesn't mention it.
- Proposal (Hugo) [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69b
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0049.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC75g: RPC should allow element wildcards [.1]
- Proposal (Roberto) [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75g
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0038.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC84b: [.1]
- Proposal (Hugo) [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue
- Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
extension
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC54
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC74: Idle question [.1]
- Can WSDL 2.0 import WSDL 1.0?
- Note that the resolution to LC5e [.2] defines WSDL Document as
WSDL 2.0 namespace.
- Options:
a) No. Spec (with LC5e resolution) is clear enough.
b) No. Specifically note that i*ing 1.1 docs is not supported.
c) Yes. Change spec to define that this is possible, though
how to turn a WSDL 1.1 doc into WSDL 2.0 components is not
defined.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC5e
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.1]
- Relax requirement that include href must be dereferencable.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:56:19 UTC