"Ambiguous" editorial action item from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2005-04-07 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2005)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:47:36 +0200
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: WSD Public <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Message-id: <42555618.3000307@crf.canon.fr>

Jonathan,

I've tracked down the ambiguous editorial action item, described as:
     "2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists"

This has to do with the "Unique GED" objection[1], and David Booth's 
proposal[2], more particularly his summary slide[3].

David seemed to be saying that the (at the time) exisitng operation name 
mapping requirements was worded ambiguously.

I haven't followed this issue very closely, but has it not been solved 
since the comment was made?

Jean-Jacques.

[1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0038.html>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/1110-dbooth-opname/>
[3] <http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/1110-dbooth-opname/slide25-0.html>

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 15:47:51 UTC