- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:56:55 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0007.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Paul Downey,
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Rebecca Bergersen, Hugo Haas,
Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Mar 31 telcon [.1] Belated regrets from Sanjiva and Umit.
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0116/2005033
1-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith proposal
using an extension namespace. (LC54),
due 2005-04-13.
? 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing the compromise
proposal on formal objections, due ??.
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal and email it
to the list as a response to the objection,
due ??.
?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for
the purpose of interoperability testing,
due 2005-04-07.
? 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specfic text for
the editors (LC18), due ??.
? 2005-02-17: Jacekk to help Bijan advance the RDF mapping work,
due ??.
? 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C to
RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still relavant,
due ??.
? 2005-03-10: Marsh to troll minutes looking for more CR
criteria, due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.4] 2005-03-24: DaveO to dig up his old proposal for URL-encoding
namespaces, for Issue LC77a: Namespaced
elements and urlformencoded, due 2005-04-13.
DONE [.5] 2005-03-24: DaveO to propose text for Issue LC47: describing
the HTTP error text for faults, due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-24: DaveO to query MS whether they would support part
of the HTTP binding if divided, due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP binding
into 3 bindings, due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-31: Paul to raise issue for extensibility/versioning
for wsdl using schema 1.0, due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
to produce a component/property table via XSLT,
due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-31: Hugo to propose solution for multipart/related
69b, due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-31: Marsh to look into Roberto's 75g proposal,
due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Marsh to see about Berlin logistics,
due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Paul will respond to Primer Issue 107,
due 2005-04-07.
DONE 2005-03-31: Marsh to inquire about Glen and 7.2 for primer,
due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Kevin to fix editorial POST/GET and safety edits,
due 2005-04-07.
DONE [.6] 2005-03-31: Arthur to move section 8 to front and issue
is editorial, due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Amy to propose text for schemaLocation that Arthur
will evaluate, due 2005-04-07.
?* 2005-03-31: Arthur produces test cases for schemaLocation-less
imports, due 2005-04-07.
DONE [.3] 2005-03-31: Hugo will send to list the history and discuss
alignment issue with RFC 2396 (LC69a),
due 2005-04-07.
? 2005-03-31: Arthur to propose LC80 solution, due 2005-04-13.
Outstanding editorial work:
HOLD 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec,
except the frag-id which will move
within media-type reg appendix.
? 2004-09-16: Editors to fix paragraph 6-9 of section
2.1.1 moved into 2.1.2
which talks about the syntax.
? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like:
The Style property may constrain both
input and output, however a particular
style may constrain in only one
direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1.
? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists
? 2005-01-13: Part 1 Editors to incorporate the text
at 2004Dec/0022.html.
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to call out the difference
between WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 in respect to
single interface per service, and
indicate alternatives
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to rewrite ONMR as Best
practice.
? 2005-03-10: Editors to check URI and schema references in
Part 1
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0002.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0007.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0046.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF dates:
- April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft)
Registration [.1] Logistics [.2]
- May 30 - June 1 Berlin
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Primer [.1]
- Status update on the following primer sections:
DONE Section 7.2 Features and Properties (Glen)
DONE Section 7.5 Versioning and Service Equivalency (Paul)
? Section 7.8 Operation Style and RPC (Umit)
? Section 7.12 XML Schema Examples (Paul)
- Next steps?
[.1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht
ml
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Media Type Description issues [.1]
- Larry's response to Issue 268 [.2]
- Joe Fialli has three comments [.3]
- I18N re-review [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html
[.4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
- RPC Style Issue (Umit) [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0104.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue LC47: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults [.1]
- "When binding a fault to the HTTP protocol, we need to be able
to specify the error text in addition to the HTTP status code."
- Proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC47
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0007.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3:
Bindings (a) [.1]
- Original Proposal [.2]
- Hugo's action [.3]
- Updated proposal [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69a
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0107.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0002.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0013.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [.1]
- "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
- Proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [.1]
- Proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0115.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC84b: [.1]
- Hugo's draft proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC69b: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3:
Bindings (b) [.1]
- XForms supports "multpart/related", WSDL doesn't mention it.
- Waiting for text from DaveO.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC69b
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [.1]
- Waiting for proposal from Arthur
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue
- Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
extension
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC54
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC74: Idle question [.1]
- Can WSDL 2.0 import WSDL 1.0?
- Note that the resolution to LC5e [.2] defines WSDL Document as
WSDL 2.0 namespace.
- Options:
a) No. Spec (with LC5e resolution) is clear enough.
b) No. Specifically note that i*ing 1.1 docs is not supported.
c) Yes. Change spec to define that this is possible, though
how to turn a WSDL 1.1 doc into WSDL 2.0 components is not
defined.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC5e
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.1]
- Relax requirement that include href must be dereferencable.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 00:56:58 UTC