- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:30:16 +0100
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Was going to implement this one, but apparently it's been done already! JJ. Martin Gudgin wrote: > +1 > > Gudge > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org >>[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth >>Sent: 19 March 2004 12:35 >>To: www-ws-desc@w3.org >>Subject: Wording on targetNamespace document >> >> >>I just noticed that the wording in section 2.1.1 about the >>targetNamespace document would (inadvertently?) prohibit two >>logical WSDL documents[1] from defining the same service. I >>assume this wording was unintentional, since there was a >>significant thread[2] about whether we should try to make >>this this prohibition, and the WG did not decide to do so. >> >>I suggest fixing this with the following wording changes. In >>the existing section 2.1.1 sentence: >>[[ >>If the service description is split into multiple documents >>(which may be combined as needed via 4.1 Including >>Descriptions), then the targetNamespace attribute information >>item SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes all >>the WSDL documents for that namespace. >>]] >> >>Simply change: >>s/If the service/If a service/ >>s/for that namespace./needed for that service description./ >> >> >>---------- >>1. For explanation of "logical WSDL document" see: >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0085.html >>2. Thread on "Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service": >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Dec/0045.html >> >> >>-- >>David Booth >>W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard >>Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 10:38:35 UTC