- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:21:37 -0800
- To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth > Sent: 19 March 2004 12:35 > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Wording on targetNamespace document > > > I just noticed that the wording in section 2.1.1 about the > targetNamespace document would (inadvertently?) prohibit two > logical WSDL documents[1] from defining the same service. I > assume this wording was unintentional, since there was a > significant thread[2] about whether we should try to make > this this prohibition, and the WG did not decide to do so. > > I suggest fixing this with the following wording changes. In > the existing section 2.1.1 sentence: > [[ > If the service description is split into multiple documents > (which may be combined as needed via 4.1 Including > Descriptions), then the targetNamespace attribute information > item SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes all > the WSDL documents for that namespace. > ]] > > Simply change: > s/If the service/If a service/ > s/for that namespace./needed for that service description./ > > > ---------- > 1. For explanation of "logical WSDL document" see: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0085.html > 2. Thread on "Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service": > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Dec/0045.html > > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 > >
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2004 04:11:52 UTC