Re: Wording on targetNamespace document

Done.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Wording on targetNamespace document


> 
> +1 
> 
> Gudge 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: 19 March 2004 12:35
> > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Wording on targetNamespace document
> > 
> > 
> > I just noticed that the wording in section 2.1.1 about the 
> > targetNamespace document would (inadvertently?) prohibit two 
> > logical WSDL documents[1] from defining the same service.  I 
> > assume this wording was unintentional, since there was a 
> > significant thread[2] about whether we should try to make 
> > this this prohibition, and the WG did not decide to do so.
> > 
> > I suggest fixing this with the following wording changes.  In 
> > the existing section 2.1.1 sentence:
> > [[
> > If the service description is split into multiple documents 
> > (which may be combined as needed via 4.1 Including 
> > Descriptions), then the targetNamespace attribute information 
> > item  SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes all 
> > the WSDL documents for that namespace.
> > ]]
> > 
> > Simply change:
> > s/If the service/If a service/
> > s/for that namespace./needed for that service description./
> > 
> > 
> > ----------
> > 1. For explanation of "logical WSDL document" see:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0085.html
> > 2. Thread on "Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service":
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Dec/0045.html
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
> > 
> >

Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 11:51:28 UTC