W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Issue 189 proposals:

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:44:05 +0200
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040727164405.GF28789@w3.org>
* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-07-26 14:44-0700]
> Hugo has already found his answer, which hopefully is that the rest of
> the xml is not serialized at all.

Oh, I got it wrong then. I wrote into the spec:

  All elements of the instance data from the input message NOT cited
  by the location attribute information item are serialized in the
  message body following the rules of the "application/xml" (see 3.8.2
  Serialization as application/xml ).



with an example I added at:


Hmmm... I had understood that it was an interesting proposal for PUT
or POST, and therefore that something needed to go into the message

But your proposal doesn't populate the body then, just limits the
serialization in the request URI. Hmmm... now I'm confused about its

In any case, I'll let you a chance to see what I had written to
confirm that I need to change it before I change the draft.



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2004 12:44:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:43 UTC