- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:37:14 +0100
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I took an action on this week's call to look into decisions made surrounding faults in the HTTP binding. seems to me the Action to "Close 166 with adopting Paul's proposal with ONE code" was simply lost. here's the history: This is issue 166: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x166 which was discussed on the 2004-05-27 telcon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0087.html proposal map HTTP fault codes to abstract faults in the HTTP binding: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0086.html which was modified and +1'd by Hugo on the list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0016.html The proposal was discussed by the WG at the 2004-06-07 teslcon [sic]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0041.html with the modification that only one fault code would be specified (original proposal was for a list of codes would be routed to a single abstract fault) - and recorded as follows: * RESOLUTION: Close 166 with adopting Paul's proposal with ONE code * ACTION: editors to incorporate Paul's proposal with ONE http code which was ?ED on the AI list for the 2004-06-10 telcon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0128.html and not mentioned in the 2004-06-17 telcon Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0140.html *but* no mention of it on the ED-To-Do list. As Hugo raised on today's call, the HTTP fault is missing from our latest draft, though the pseudo-schema has a place holder: """ <-- New HTTP Fault binding in here? -- > <fault ref="xs:QName" wsoap:code="xs:QName" wsoap:subcodes="list of xs:QName" > <documentation />? </fault>* """ there's no XML representation or component model mapping for HTTP faults. it just looks like the action went AWOL - c'est la vie. Paul -- Paul Sumner Downey Web Services Integration BT Exact
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 17:37:50 UTC