- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:07:10 +0100
- To: <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Prasad wrote: > Jim wrote: > > You're right here, sort of. The first time something breaks you've got a >> head start because you immediately know what operation is causing the >> problem. However over time as your service evolves and perhaps the >> wsdl:operation and the com.foo.Bar.operation() method become more >> detached (perhaps completely) > > If this really the way you design and maintain things, you are right it does > not matter if you had operations or not. Glad I don't buy software from you :) AIUI Jim's describing a facade pattern. it's legitimate in my book for the underlying implementation to change under the published interface, but what this has to do with the "whichOperation" issue escapes me. Paul
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 16:07:10 UTC