Re: FW: Action Item 2004-07-01 Solution to 168/R114

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:01:31 -0700
Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> wrote:
> We provide facilities to mark features and extension elements as
> required for just this purpose.  Specifically, services which demand
> that clients use WS-Addressing or WS-MD for proper operation would
> presumably have to indicate this requirement in the WSDL through a
> required feature or wsdl:required="true".  Isn't this adequate?

Yes.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2004 14:13:02 UTC