- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:24:13 +0200
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hi Sanjiva, The way I was reading Dave's proposal, he was not hijacking the current SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding, but using it twice "in sequence", to provide the 2-MEP equivalent. Maybe he meant something else? I don't want to put words in his mouth. JJ. Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >>I am a bit uneasy about creating new (SOAP) bindings uncesserily. In >>certain circumstances, I agree with Sanjiva, this is unavoidable. >>However, for simpler cases, I like Dave's idea of essentially providing >>a "MEP scripting language". This helps reuse existing bindings when >>applicable. >> >> > >But at what price? I don't like the price of 2 SOAP-MEPs for one >WSDL MEP. Furthermore, Dave's doing at best a liberal reading of >SOAP1.2 and, at worst a full-scale violation of it to achieve the >2 SOAP-MEP thing using the current SOAP-HTTP binding. > >
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 03:25:26 UTC