- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:58:53 -0400
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
I am in entire agreement with Sanjiva on this topic. On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:14:18 +0600 Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote: > I still haven't seen a defined semantic of what @webMethod="GET" or > @webMethod="POST" means in a generic sense. Can you please provide > those semantics? What are the accepted values for @webMethod? > > Unless such semantics can be given *in an HTTP independent manner* > and they can potentially be bound to other protocols, I'm most > definitely -1 on adding @webMethod to interface/operation. > > I would specifically appreciate your explaining the relationship > between @webMethod and @safe (the latter of which we already have). > Also, in a SOAP world, how would @webMethod interact with > wsoap:mep (and the implied HTTP method when SOAP/HTTP is in use)? Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 10:59:14 UTC