- From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:41:28 -0700
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <40E4AF38.4050505@oracle.com>
Jonathan Marsh wrote: >And these two as well: > - 226 Cross-binding HTTP features > - 232 Differentiate our MEPs from underlying protocol MEPs > Jonathan, I am ok with the previous set but not clear why you are proposing to mark 232 an editorial item. Could we see the text please? Thanks. --umit > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] >> >> >On > > >>Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh >>Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:20 PM >>To: Web Services Description >>Subject: Issues 227, 231, 234, 235 >> >> >>The WG previously agreed to refer these editorial issues to the >> >> >editors, > > >>who were to come back if they had issues with anything therein: >>- (ed) 208 Misc. editorial comments >>- (ed) 213 Refine component model property constraints >>- (ed) 215 Clarify rule obviation >> >>I propose we do the same with the following editorial issues: >>- 227 Description of Binding Operation component >>- 231 Clarify "patterns" >>- 234 Ruleset terminology >>- 235 Definition of Fault >> >>If you wish to discuss any of these issues in detail, please let me >>know, otherwise I'll refer them to the editors for resolution on >>Thursday without discussion. >> >> > > > > -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 20:42:39 UTC