- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:54:11 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I believe that the updated Message Patterns draft closes the following
action items.
? 2003-03-04: Editors of the MEPs to record in that document our
intention that a CR requirement be that MEPs that
prove their utility will be left in. The
"utility"
metric is that a binding (not necessarily from
this
group) which makes use of that MEP be
interoperable
between two vendors.
? 2003-03-04: Editors MEP to add an issue to address
request-response MEP
? 2003-03-04: Editors MEP to suggest meaningful names for our
MEPs
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.
xml
Try as I might, I could not find anywhere (yet) that we refer to the
parts by number. I believe this action item is moot at present.
? 2003-03-04: Editors to rename MEP spec to Part 2, old Part 2
becomes Part 3.
--Jeff
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:54:19 UTC