RE: WSDL 1.2 drafts update

I have just had a quick browse of the drafts. Overall I like the new drafts and certainly appreciate the editors' great job to incorporate the WG decisions in the latest draft.

Just noticed, with a bit surprise, that some typos and unclarity SAP humbly submitted have not been addressed. I sent 5 comments to the group list on end of April (see [1]). The group discussed the comments in May 8 (see [2]) and decided that "The editors will add the comments as a new issue". But obviously the typos and the insularity remain the same in the public draft. I am under the impression that the group agreed that we need to fix the typos and insularity in the publication. Am I missing anything here? If the group made a different decision that I am not aware of, can someone point me to the minutes?  

Best Regards, 
Kevin 

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0166.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0037.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:17 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: WSDL 1.2 drafts update



FYI, Parts 1, 2, and 3 have been updated. See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#public_drafts

Philippe

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 03:01:34 UTC