- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:24:53 +0200
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
This is much better, thanks. Actually, I think we should also change 'SOAP role' to 'soap:role'. Jean-Jacques. Martin Gudgin wrote: > Also suggest you merge the following two sentences; > > 'Omitting the SOAP role attribute information item is equivalent to > indicating value of > "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver". > An empty value is equivalent to omitting the attribute completely, i.e. > targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.' > > To read > > 'A SOAP role attribute information item that is either absent or has an > empty value is equivalent to indicating a value of > "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver" i.e. > targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 11:25:42 UTC