- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:12:20 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Well, I think it sould probably just be 'role', as it appears on a soap:header element there is no need to qualify the attribute. Gudge -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] Sent: 26 June 2002 16:25 To: Martin Gudgin Cc: Web Service Description Subject: Re: Issue 17: support for SOAP role attribute This is much better, thanks. Actually, I think we should also change 'SOAP role' to 'soap:role'. Jean-Jacques. Martin Gudgin wrote: > Also suggest you merge the following two sentences; > > 'Omitting the SOAP role attribute information item is equivalent to > indicating value of > "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver". > An empty value is equivalent to omitting the attribute completely, > i.e. targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.' > > To read > > 'A SOAP role attribute information item that is either absent or has > an empty value is equivalent to indicating a value of > "http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver" i.e. > targeting the SOAP header block to an ultimate SOAP receiver.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 12:12:52 UTC